Social justice id both a philosophical debate and an
important issue in politics and in a civic society. Most individuals wish to
live in a just society but different political ideologies have different
concepts of what a just society actually is. In general terms social justice
can be defined not only as equality of opportunity but also as equality of
outcome.
The addition of the
world” social justice” clearly distinguishes ” social justice” from the concept
of “justice” as applied in the law or state administered systems. Some ideologists
relate it with individual freedom and some link it with a just distribution of
opportunities. Justice is simply related to the enforcement of a formal mechanism of control for an unacceptable
behavior. social justice as an informal concept of justice refers to the
overall fairness of a society in its divisions and distributions of rewards and
opportunities. social justice derives its authority from the codes of morality prevailing
in each culture:
The idea of social
justice may grip some or all of the following beliefs:
1 historical inequities insofar as they affect current
injustices should be corrected until the actual inequities no longer exist or
have been perceptively negated
2. the redistribution of wealth power and status for the
individual, community should take place to obtain social justice.
3. it is governments responsibility to ensure a basic quality of life for all its
citizens.
social justice is a concept that has fascinated theorists ever
since. Plato in the republic ritualistic the argument that an ideal state would
rest on four virtues wisdom, courage, restraint,, and justice. Hence, true social
justice is attained only through the harmonious co operative efforts of the
citizens who in their own self interest accept the current norms of morality as
the price of membership in the community.
The next major
impetus for the development of this concept is linked with Thomas Aquinas who
says justice is a certain rectitude of mind whereby a man does
what he ought to do in the circumstances’ confronting him as a theologian Aquinas
believed that justice is a form of
natural duty owed by one person to another and not enforced by any human made
law. This reflects this Christian view that befor god all people are equal and
must treat each other with respect. John locks (1632=1704) argued that people
have innate natural goodness and beauty and so in the long run if individuals
rationally pursue their private happiness and pleasure the interests of the
society or the general welfare will be looked after fairly. Immanuel kant
believed that actions are morally right
if they if they are motivated by duty without regard to any personal goal
desire motive or self interest.
No comments:
Post a Comment